Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is characterised by intense inflammation, systemic response, and often, multiorgan failure. The early phase is marked by catabolism, fluid shifts and a high risk of infection. Adequate nutrition supports gut barrier integrity, modulates the immune response and reduces the incidence of infectious complications. Historically, patients were kept nilbymouth and fed parenterally, but mounting evidence now favours early enteral nutrition (EEN) as the preferred route. Enteral delivery supplies luminal nutrients that stimulate mucosal blood flow, preserve tightjunction proteins and promote the production of secretory IgA. This limits bacterial translocation from the gut lumen to the bloodstream, a key driver of sepsis in SAP. Shortchain fatty acids produced by bacterial fermentation of fibrerich formulas have antiinflammatory effects. Moreover, early feeding attenuates the release of cytokines such as TNF, IL6 and IL1, dampening the systemic inflammatory response. Enteral nutrition provides glutamine, arginine and omega3 fatty acids, substrates that support lymphocyte proliferation, macrophage activity and oxidative balance. Guidelines from the American College of Gastroenterology, the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) and the International Association of Pancreatology all recommend initiating EEN within 2448hours of admission, provided there are no absolute contraindications such as intestinal perforation, uncontrolled hemorrhage, or severe ileus. Early initiation (<24h) has been linked with lower rates of infectious complications and shorter intensivecare stays, without increasing the risk of exacerbating pancreatic inflammation. NG feeding is technically simple, can be placed at the bedside and is well tolerated in most patients. Multiple randomized trials have shown no significant difference in outcomes compared with nasojejunal (NJ) feeding, provided that gastric residual volumes are monitored. Historically preferred to bypass the stomach and reduce pancreatic stimulation, NJ feeding remains useful when severe gastric distension, high residual volumes, or persistent vomiting occur. Endoscopic or fluoroscopic placement is required, which may delay nutrition. Considered only when prolonged feeding (>4weeks) is anticipated or when NG/NJ tubes fail. These are rarely needed during the acute phase of SAP. There is no universally superior formula; the choice should be patientcentred. Highfat, lowcarbohydrate regimens are not recommended because excessive fat delivery can stimulate pancreatic secretion through cholecystokinin release. While generally safe, enteral feeding can be associated with: Metaanalyses of randomized controlled trials consistently demonstrate that early enteral nutrition reduces infectious complications (odds ratio0.55) and mortality (relative risk0.78) compared with delayed feeding or parenteral nutrition. The benefits are most pronounced when feeding is started within 24hours and when gastric tolerance is monitored closely.Enteral Nutrition in Severe Acute Pancreatitis
Why Nutrition Matters
Physiological Rationale for Enteral Feeding
Maintaining Gut Mucosal Integrity
Modulating Inflammatory Pathways
Preserving Immune Function
When to Start Enteral Nutrition
Choice of Feeding Route
Nasogastric (NG) Tube
Nasojejunal (NJ) Tube
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) or Jejunostomy (PEJ)
Formula Selection
Practical Feeding Protocol
Complications and Management
Evidence Overview
Key Recommendations (20232024 Guidelines)
Selected References
