Speaking skill is a crucial component of English language learning, enabling students to communicate effectively in real-life situations. This descriptive study investigated the strategies used by English teachers in teaching speaking at SMP Negeri 23 Surakarta during the academic year 2020/2021. The research employed classroom observations, teacher interviews, and document analysis to identify the speaking teaching strategies implemented by teachers. The findings revealed that teachers used various strategies including direct instruction, information gap activities, role-play, picture description, group discussion, storytelling, and debate. Each strategy had its strengths and challenges in facilitating students' speaking development. The study also examined factors influencing teachers' choices of strategies and students' responses to these strategies. The results provide insights into effective approaches for teaching speaking and suggest implications for English language teaching practice in junior high school contexts.
English speaking skills have become increasingly important in today's globalized world. As a means of communication, speaking enables individuals to express thoughts, convey information, and build relationships across linguistic and cultural boundaries. In Indonesia, English is taught as a foreign language starting from elementary school level. The junior high school curriculum assigns significant importance to developing students' speaking ability alongside other language skills.
Despite the recognized importance of speaking skills, many English language learners in Indonesia continue to face challenges in developing oral proficiency. These challenges stem from various factors including limited exposure to authentic English input, lack of practice opportunities, and anxiety associated with speaking in a foreign language. Teachers play a critical role in addressing these challenges through the implementation of effective teaching strategies.
SMP Negeri 23 Surakarta is a public junior high school in Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia, with approximately 800 students across grades 7-9. Like many Indonesian schools, it faces the challenge of enhancing students' English speaking abilities within limited contact hours and resources. Understanding the strategies employed by English teachers in this context contributes valuable insights to the broader field of English language teaching.
Speaking skills occupy a central position in communicative language teaching approaches. Nunan (2015) emphasizes that speaking differs from other language skills in its spontaneous nature and the pressure it places on language learners to produce language in real-time. This characteristic makes speaking particularly challenging for language learners.
Bailey (2018) categorizes speaking strategies into speaking-learning strategies and speaking-use strategies. Speaking-learning strategies are those employed to develop speaking ability, while speaking-use strategies help learners overcome difficulties during actual communication. The research literature suggests that effective teaching of speaking should address both these aspects.
Richards (2019) identifies various approaches to teaching speaking, including accuracy-focused activities that emphasize correct pronunciation, grammar, and vocabulary, and fluency-focused activities that prioritize communication flow. The best teaching programs typically balance these approaches, providing structured practice with opportunities for meaningful communication.
This study employed a descriptive qualitative research design to provide a detailed account of the speaking teaching strategies used by English teachers at SMP Negeri 23 Surakarta. The descriptive approach was appropriate for capturing the complexity of classroom practices and teacher decision-making processes.
The study was conducted at SMP Negeri 23 Surakarta during the academic year 2020/2021. The participants included three English teachers who taught students across grades 7-9. The teachers had varying levels of experience, ranging from five to fifteen years of teaching English.
Data were collected through three main instruments: classroom observation protocols, semi-structured interview guides, and document analysis templates. The observation protocol allowed researchers to record teaching strategies, classroom activities, teacher-student interactions, and student responses during speaking lessons.
The research team conducted eight classroom observations spanning different grades and teaching schedules. Each observation lasted 45 minutes, covering one complete instructional period. Following the observations, teachers participated in individual interviews lasting approximately 30 minutes each to provide insights into their decision-making processes regarding strategy selection and implementation.
Data analysis followed Miles and Huberman's (2014) model of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. The research team transcribed interview recordings, analyzed observation notes, and reviewed relevant teaching documents. Coding was performed to identify recurring themes and patterns related to speaking teaching strategies.
The analysis revealed that English teachers at SMP Negeri 23 Surakarta employed multiple strategies for teaching speaking. These strategies are presented in Table 1, along with their frequency of use and observed characteristics.
| Strategy | Frequency of Use | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Direct Instruction | High | Explicit teaching of pronunciation, intonation patterns, and phrase structures |
| Information Gap Activities | High | Activities requiring students to obtain missing information from peers |
| Role-Play | Medium | Scenarios where students adopt roles and interact in predetermined situations |
| Picture Description | Medium | Students describe visual stimuli individually or in pairs |
| Group Discussion | Medium | Small group discussions on assigned topics |
| Storytelling | Low | Students retell familiar stories or create new narratives |
| Debate | Low | Structured argumentation on controversial topics |
Direct instruction emerged as the most frequently used strategy, appearing in nearly every observed lesson. Teachers employed this strategy to explicitly teach speaking sub-skills such as correct pronunciation, intonation patterns, and common English phrases. For example, Teacher A used direct instruction to demonstrate appropriate stress and intonation in question forms during a seventh-grade lesson. Teacher B employed the strategy to introduce functional language for making requests, providing clear examples before allowing students to practice.
Information gap activities featured prominently in the speaking instruction at SMP Negeri 23 Surakarta. These activities, based on the communicative language teaching approach, required students to obtain information from their peers to complete tasks. Teachers designed various information gap activities using picture pairs, incomplete texts, and survey forms. These activities created authentic communication needs, motivating students to speak in English to accomplish their goals.
Role-play activities allowed students to practice speaking in simulated real-life situations. Teachers commonly used role-play for functional language practice, such as shopping at a store, ordering food, or asking for directions. Teacher C particularly favored role-play, noting that "students become more engaged when they can imagine themselves in real situations." These activities often included preparation time where students could plan their utterances before performing the role-play.
Picture description activities involved students describing visual stimuli either individually or in pairs. Teachers used various types of images, including photographs, drawings, and charts. This strategy was particularly effective for practicing descriptive language and vocabulary. Teachers found that low-proficiency students could participate successfully in picture description activities, as the visuals provided support for their speaking attempts.
Group discussions allowed students to express opinions on assigned topics within small groups. Teachers typically assigned thought-provoking questions related to the themes being studied in class. These discussions promoted extended speaking practice and higher-order thinking. However, observations revealed that group discussions sometimes shifted to Indonesian language use, especially when students encountered challenges expressing complex ideas in English.
Though used infrequently, storytelling appeared in some creative teaching moments. Teacher A used storytelling when teaching narrative texts, asking students to retell familiar Indonesian folk tales in English. Teacher B employed a modified version called "chain storytelling," where each student contributed one sentence to create a collective story. These activities were particularly engaging for students and encouraged creativity in speaking.
Debate was the least frequently used strategy, implemented only with advanced classes or when teachers wanted to challenge high-achieving students. The structured format of debates required students to argue for or against a proposition using appropriate language for presenting opinions, agreeing and disagreeing, and building arguments. Teacher C noted that debates were time-consuming and challenging to prepare, making them impractical for regular classroom use despite their pedagogical value.
Teachers reported several factors influencing their choice of speaking teaching strategies:
The variety of speaking teaching strategies observed at SMP Negeri 23 Surakarta reflects a balanced approach to developing both accuracy and fluency in speaking. The prominence of direct instruction alongside communicative activities suggests that teachers recognize the importance of providing students with explicit knowledge of English pronunciation, intonation, and functional expressions before engaging in communicative practice.
The frequent implementation of information gap activities aligns with communicative language teaching principles that emphasize authentic communication in language learning. These activities created genuine information exchange needs, which likely enhanced student motivation and meaningful language use.
Role-play activities provided structured yet meaningful speaking practice. While some researchers criticize role-plays for lacking authenticity compared to real-world communication, they appear particularly suitable for junior high school students who may benefit from the structured support before attempting spontaneous conversation.
The infrequent use of challenging strategies like debate and storytelling may reflect various constraints including time pressure, student proficiency levels, and curriculum demands. However, these strategies offer valuable opportunities for extended speaking practice and development of complex language use. Teachers at SMP Negeri 23 Surakarta might consider finding ways to incorporate these more challenging strategies occasionally to provide additional speaking development opportunities.
The factors influencing strategy selection reveal teachers' awareness of contextual variables in their pedagogical decision-making. Their adaptations based on student proficiency, class size, and time constraints demonstrate the complex considerations required in effective language teaching practice.
This descriptive study investigated the strategies used by English teachers in teaching speaking at SMP Negeri 23 Surakarta during the 2020/2021 academic year. The findings reveal that teachers employed a variety of strategies including direct instruction, information gap activities, role-play, picture description, group discussion, storytelling, and debate. Each strategy contributed to developing different aspects of students' speaking abilities.
Teachers demonstrated adaptability in their strategy selection based on student proficiency levels, lesson objectives, time constraints, class size, and curriculum requirements. This adaptability reflects their sensitive approach to addressing the diverse needs of their students within challenging classroom contexts.
The study suggests that teachers at SMP Negeri 23 Surakarta have developed a repertoire of effective speaking teaching strategies that balance accuracy-focused and fluency-focused approaches. The findings contribute to our understanding of English speaking instruction in Indonesian junior high school contexts and provide practical insights for teachers seeking to enhance their speaking pedagogy.
Future research could investigate the effectiveness of these strategies through experimental studies examining their impact on student speaking proficiency. Additionally, research exploring student perceptions of these strategies would provide valuable insights into ways to further enhance speaking instruction.
